Diary entries forFilm Socialisme
Film Socialisme
๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ง ๐ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ ๐ด๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ง. ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆโ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฏ ๐ท๐ฐ๐ช๐ค๐ฆ, ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ต ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ? ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ง. ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ง ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ. "๐๐บ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด๐ด. ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐จ๐ถ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต๐ฉ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ถ๐ต๐ด ๐ถ๐ฑ. ๐๐ต ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฎ ๐ข ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐๐ตโ๐ด ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ. ๐โ๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ. ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ. ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ. ๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ, ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฃ '๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฆ', ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ข๐ค๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต." I donโt know if weโre talking anymore. Or the way we are talking bores the shit out of me. Itโs the way you talk about art and less and less I want to talk about art with you. I donโt care whether or not you like one thing or another. I want to care about how itโs shifting in scene or if a particular piece has moved you. Your lack of vocabulary in how to express yourself equates to how I feel about most people in LA. Vapid. Without context. Microscopic soundbites that flutter into the chaos of noise of the world. โ๐๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ง๐ข๐ค๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ช๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐บ๐ด๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ช๐ด ๐ข ๐ด๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ช๐ณ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ญ๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ต ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ข๐ฏ ๐๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ช๐ณ๐ฆ, ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฎ.โ I remember when this first premiered at Cannes, making the rounds and navigating around dislike and shrugs around its palatability. But Godard has always been known to break cinema, taking it apart, fixating on the mechanics, and Frankensteining it in a way to to speak to aliments of the world at large. There was less of a review and more of a comment on here about how inaccessible the film was based on history and this is by no fault of Godard but by the reviewerโs own ignorance. In a time where you can literally look at the context of the world at any given point in history we choose to ignore the work of understanding and remain careless. And itโs carelessness in your vocabulary. In all the ways you may move through the world that you surrender yourself to the stature of the way we communicate. Rooney is right and itโs awful how right she is in accenting our miscommunications with each other. tl:dr โ Iโm tired of the way we talk to each other and itโs no real use anymore. I often think of the work that I do put out and its totality of all that I mean. In the end, there is so little left to say outside of these musings. Here and there. There is so little to convey to you that I am here. A chunk of text, read or unread, all to dust and ash and time. Rightfully so, itโs done here in the archival eye of text and image, an eclectic ensemble of cameras, in the offbeat cameo of Patti Smith. A lot is said here, exactly as I do, exactly as I am that orchestrates into the doped out sounds of late Chet Baker. Itโs all noise in the end. And yet you choose to base the noise on if you like it or dislike it. How pathetic. "๐๐ฆโ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ด๐ข๐บ โ๐๐ฆโ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ข๐บ '๐'." Iโm looking for the people that care. Care too much. Why are there so few of us?